LeanMachineLearning

getOriginalType๐Ÿ”—

Opaque

Get the original type from a lifted type.

๐Ÿ”—opaque
getOriginalType (t : Lean.Expr) : Lean.MetaM (Lean.Expr ร— Lean.Level)
getOriginalType (t : Lean.Expr) : Lean.MetaM (Lean.Expr ร— Lean.Level)

Code

partial def getOriginalType (t : Expr) : MetaM (Expr ร— Level)
Proof
do
  let twhnf โ† whnf t
  match twhnf.getAppFn with
  | Expr.const ``PUnit _ | Expr.const ``Unit _ =>
    return (mkConst ``Unit [], 0)
  | Expr.const ``ULift univs =>
    return (twhnf.getAppArgs[0]!, univs[1]!)
  | Expr.const ``Prod _ =>
    let args := twhnf.getAppArgs
    let (X, xLvl) โ† getOriginalType args[0]!
    let (Y, yLvl) โ† getOriginalType args[1]!
    return (โ† mkAppM ``Prod #[X, Y], .max xLvl yLvl)
  | _ =>
    return (t, โ† getDecLevel (โ† inferType t))

Actions: Source ยท Open Issue

Meaning last changed in v4.34.0-rc2-1-g439785b (2026-08-23).

Self-contained, with its dependencies inlined and proofs replaced by sorry: download the raw file ยท open it in the Lean web editor.

Dependency graph

Nothing to draw. Its statement rests on no other declaration in this project, and names nothing from a package left unaudited โ€” so the graph is this declaration alone. That is the answer, not a missing picture.

Audit surface: 0 project declarations, 4 external constants

โœ“ Proved: no sorry anywhere in its closure

This is the tool's own reading of one build's recorded axioms, and it is not robust against an author who wants it to pass. Checking meant to be relied on should go through Comparator, which replays the proof through the kernel from an export against an explicit list of permitted axioms.