LeanMachineLearning

ProbabilityTheory.Kernel.map_parallelComp_map🔗

Lemma

No docstring.

🔗theorem
ProbabilityTheory.Kernel.map_parallelComp_map.{u_1, u_2, u_3, u_4, u_5,
    u_6}
  {α : Type u_1} {β : Type u_2} {γ : Type u_3} {ι : Type u_4}
  [MeasurableSpace α] [MeasurableSpace β] [MeasurableSpace γ]
  [MeasurableSpace ι] {β₂ : Type u_5} {ι₂ : Type u_6}
  [MeasurableSpace β₂] [MeasurableSpace ι₂] (κ : Kernel α β)
  (η : Kernel γ ι) [IsSFiniteKernel κ] [IsSFiniteKernel η] {f : β → β₂}
  {g : ι → ι₂} (hf : Measurable f) (hg : Measurable g) :
  parallelComp (map κ f) (map η g) =
    map (parallelComp κ η) fun a => (f (Prod.fst a), g (Prod.snd a))
ProbabilityTheory.Kernel.map_parallelComp_map.{u_1,
    u_2, u_3, u_4, u_5, u_6}
  {α : Type u_1} {β : Type u_2}
  {γ : Type u_3} {ι : Type u_4}
  [MeasurableSpace α] [MeasurableSpace β]
  [MeasurableSpace γ] [MeasurableSpace ι]
  {β₂ : Type u_5} {ι₂ : Type u_6}
  [MeasurableSpace β₂]
  [MeasurableSpace ι₂] (κ : Kernel α β)
  (η : Kernel γ ι) [IsSFiniteKernel κ]
  [IsSFiniteKernel η] {f : β → β₂}
  {g : ι → ι₂} (hf : Measurable f)
  (hg : Measurable g) :
  parallelComp (map κ f) (map η g) =
    map (parallelComp κ η) fun a =>
      (f (Prod.fst a), g (Prod.snd a))

Code

lemma map_parallelComp_map {β₂ ι₂ : Type*} [MeasurableSpace β₂] [MeasurableSpace ι₂]
    (κ : Kernel α β) (η : Kernel γ ι) [IsSFiniteKernel κ] [IsSFiniteKernel η]
    {f : β → β₂} {g : ι → ι₂} (hf : Measurable f) (hg : Measurable g) :
    κ.map f ∥ₖ η.map g = (κ ∥ₖ η).map (fun a ↦ (f a.1, g a.2))
Proof
by
  ext a s hs
  rw [Kernel.parallelComp_apply', Kernel.lintegral_map, Kernel.map_apply',
    Kernel.parallelComp_apply']
  · congr with x
    rw [Kernel.map_apply' _ (by fun_prop) _ (by measurability)]
    congr
  all_goals try fun_prop
  all_goals try measurability
  exact measurable_measure_prodMk_left hs

Actions: Source · Open Issue

Meaning last changed in v4.34.0-rc2-1-g439785b (2026-08-23).

Self-contained, with its dependencies inlined and proofs replaced by sorry: download the raw file · open it in the Lean web editor.

Dependency graph

Nothing to draw. Its statement rests on no other declaration in this project, and names nothing from a package left unaudited — so the graph is this declaration alone. That is the answer, not a missing picture.

Audit surface: 0 project declarations, 12 external constants

✓ Proved: no sorry anywhere in its closure

This is the tool's own reading of one build's recorded axioms, and it is not robust against an author who wants it to pass. Checking meant to be relied on should go through Comparator, which replays the proof through the kernel from an export against an explicit list of permitted axioms.