Learning.IsObliviousEnv.hasCondDistrib_feedback
No docstring.
Learning.IsObliviousEnv.hasCondDistrib_feedback.{u_1, u_2, u_3} {๐ : Type u_1} {๐จ : Type u_2} {m๐ : MeasurableSpace ๐} {m๐จ : MeasurableSpace ๐จ} {ฮฉ : Type u_3} {mฮฉ : MeasurableSpace ฮฉ} {alg : Algorithm ๐ ๐จ} {env : Environment ๐ ๐จ} {P : MeasureTheory.Measure ฮฉ} [MeasureTheory.IsFiniteMeasure P] {A : โ โ ฮฉ โ ๐} {Y : โ โ ฮฉ โ ๐จ} [IsObliviousEnv env] (h : IsAlgEnvSeq A Y alg env P) (n : โ) : ProbabilityTheory.HasCondDistrib (Y n) (A n) (feedbackCondAction env n) PLearning.IsObliviousEnv.hasCondDistrib_feedback.{u_1, u_2, u_3} {๐ : Type u_1} {๐จ : Type u_2} {m๐ : MeasurableSpace ๐} {m๐จ : MeasurableSpace ๐จ} {ฮฉ : Type u_3} {mฮฉ : MeasurableSpace ฮฉ} {alg : Algorithm ๐ ๐จ} {env : Environment ๐ ๐จ} {P : MeasureTheory.Measure ฮฉ} [MeasureTheory.IsFiniteMeasure P] {A : โ โ ฮฉ โ ๐} {Y : โ โ ฮฉ โ ๐จ} [IsObliviousEnv env] (h : IsAlgEnvSeq A Y alg env P) (n : โ) : ProbabilityTheory.HasCondDistrib (Y n) (A n) (feedbackCondAction env n) P
Code
lemma hasCondDistrib_feedback [IsObliviousEnv env] (h : IsAlgEnvSeq A Y alg env P) (n : โ) :
HasCondDistrib (Y n) (A n) (feedbackCondAction env n) PProof
by
have hA := h.measurable_action
have hY := h.measurable_feedback
cases n with
| zero => rw [โ ฮฝ0_eq_feedbackCondAction]; exact h.hasCondDistrib_feedback_zero
| succ n =>
refine โจby fun_prop, ?_โฉ
have h_eq := (h.hasCondDistrib_feedback n).map_eq
have : P.map (A (n + 1)) =
(P.map (fun x โฆ (history A Y n x, A (n + 1) x))).snd := by
rw [Measure.snd_map_prodMk (by fun_prop)]
simp only [feedback_eq_feedbackCondAction] at h_eq
rw [this, โ Measure.snd_prodAssoc_compProd_prodMkLeft, โ h_eq,
Measure.snd_map_prodMk (by fun_prop), Measure.map_map (by fun_prop) (by fun_prop)]
congrActions: Source ยท Open Issue
Meaning last changed in v4.34.0-rc2-1-g439785b (2026-08-23), the 4th recorded change.
Self-contained, with its dependencies inlined and proofs replaced by sorry: download the raw file ยท open it in the Lean web editor.
Dependency graph
Audit surface: 6 project declarations, 44 external constants
โ Proved: no sorry anywhere in its closure
This is the tool's own reading of one build's recorded axioms, and it is not robust against an author who wants it to pass. Checking meant to be relied on should go through Comparator, which replays the proof through the kernel from an export against an explicit list of permitted axioms.