LeanMachineLearning exposition

Learning.IT.measurable_step_prod🔗

This page has the declaration's own card below, then its dependency graph, then a card for each dependency (type dependencies first, then the rest of the transitive closure). For a theorem, the graph and the dependency cards only follow its statement's dependencies (its proof is replaced by sorry, so what it proves doesn't depend on how); for everything else, both the type and the body/value are followed, since their content is part of what later declarations build on.

Minimal Lean file

measurable_step_prod🔗

LemmaLearning.IT.measurable_step_prod

No docstring.

🔗theorem
Learning.IT.measurable_step_prod.{u_1, u_2} {𝓐 : Type u_1} {𝓨 : Type u_2} {m𝓐 : MeasurableSpace 𝓐} {m𝓨 : MeasurableSpace 𝓨} : Measurable fun p => step (Prod.fst p) (Prod.snd p)
Learning.IT.measurable_step_prod.{u_1, u_2} {𝓐 : Type u_1} {𝓨 : Type u_2} {m𝓐 : MeasurableSpace 𝓐} {m𝓨 : MeasurableSpace 𝓨} : Measurable fun p => step (Prod.fst p) (Prod.snd p)

Code

lemma measurable_step_prod : Measurable (fun p : ℕ × (ℕ → 𝓐 × 𝓨) ↦ step p.1 p.2)
Type uses (1)
Body uses (1)

Actions: Source · Open Issue

Proof
measurable_from_prod_countable_right fun n ↦ (by simp only; fun_prop)

Dependency graph

Type dependencies (1)

step🔗

DefinitionLearning.IT.step

Action and feedback at step n.

🔗def
Learning.IT.step.{u_1, u_2} {𝓐 : Type u_1} {𝓨 : Type u_2} (n : ) (h : 𝓐 × 𝓨) : 𝓐 × 𝓨
Learning.IT.step.{u_1, u_2} {𝓐 : Type u_1} {𝓨 : Type u_2} (n : ) (h : 𝓐 × 𝓨) : 𝓐 × 𝓨

Code

def step (n : ℕ) (h : ℕ → 𝓐 × 𝓨) : 𝓐 × 𝓨 := h n
Used by (13)

Actions: Source · Open Issue