Learning.sum_pullCount_mul
This page has the declaration's own card below, then its dependency graph, then a card for each dependency (type dependencies first, then the rest of the transitive closure). For a theorem, the graph and the dependency cards only follow its statement's dependencies (its proof is replaced by sorry, so what it proves doesn't depend on how); for everything else, both the type and the body/value are followed, since their content is part of what later declarations build on.
sum_pullCount_mul๐
Learning.sum_pullCount_mulNo docstring.
Learning.sum_pullCount_mul.{u_1, u_2, u_3} {๐ : Type u_1} {R : Type u_2} {ฮฉ : Type u_3} [DecidableEq ๐] {A : โ โ ฮฉ โ ๐} [Fintype ๐] [Semiring R] (ฯ : ฮฉ) (f : ๐ โ R) (t : โ) : โ a, โ(pullCount A a t ฯ) * f a = โ s โ Finset.range t, f (A s ฯ)Learning.sum_pullCount_mul.{u_1, u_2, u_3} {๐ : Type u_1} {R : Type u_2} {ฮฉ : Type u_3} [DecidableEq ๐] {A : โ โ ฮฉ โ ๐} [Fintype ๐] [Semiring R] (ฯ : ฮฉ) (f : ๐ โ R) (t : โ) : โ a, โ(pullCount A a t ฯ) * f a = โ s โ Finset.range t, f (A s ฯ)
Code
lemma sum_pullCount_mul [Fintype ๐] [Semiring R] (ฯ : ฮฉ) (f : ๐ โ R) (t : โ) :
โ a, pullCount A a t ฯ * f a = โ s โ range t, f (A s ฯ)Type uses (1)
Used by (2)
Actions: Source ยท Open Issue
Proof
by unfold pullCount classical simp_rw [card_eq_sum_ones] push_cast simp_rw [sum_mul, one_mul] exact sum_fiberwise' (range t) (A ยท ฯ) f
Dependency graph
Type dependencies (1)
pullCount๐
Learning.pullCount
Number of times action a was chosen up to time t (excluding t).
Learning.pullCount.{u_1, u_3} {๐ : Type u_1} {ฮฉ : Type u_3} [DecidableEq ๐] (A : โ โ ฮฉ โ ๐) (a : ๐) (t : โ) (ฯ : ฮฉ) : โLearning.pullCount.{u_1, u_3} {๐ : Type u_1} {ฮฉ : Type u_3} [DecidableEq ๐] (A : โ โ ฮฉ โ ๐) (a : ๐) (t : โ) (ฯ : ฮฉ) : โ
Code
noncomputable def pullCount (A : โ โ ฮฉ โ ๐) (a : ๐) (t : โ) (ฯ : ฮฉ) : โ := #(filter (fun s โฆ A s ฯ = a) (range t))
Actions: Source ยท Open Issue