Learning.pullCount_zero
This page has the declaration's own card below, then its dependency graph, then a card for each dependency (type dependencies first, then the rest of the transitive closure). For a theorem, the graph and the dependency cards only follow its statement's dependencies (its proof is replaced by sorry, so what it proves doesn't depend on how); for everything else, both the type and the body/value are followed, since their content is part of what later declarations build on.
pullCount_zero๐
Learning.pullCount_zeroNo docstring.
Learning.pullCount_zero.{u_1, u_3} {๐ : Type u_1} {ฮฉ : Type u_3} [DecidableEq ๐] {A : โ โ ฮฉ โ ๐} (a : ๐) : pullCount A a 0 = 0Learning.pullCount_zero.{u_1, u_3} {๐ : Type u_1} {ฮฉ : Type u_3} [DecidableEq ๐] {A : โ โ ฮฉ โ ๐} (a : ๐) : pullCount A a 0 = 0
Code
lemma pullCount_zero (a : ๐) : pullCount A a 0 = 0
Type uses (1)
Used by (15)
Actions: Source ยท Open Issue
Proof
by ext; simp [pullCount]
Dependency graph
Type dependencies (1)
pullCount๐
Learning.pullCount
Number of times action a was chosen up to time t (excluding t).
Learning.pullCount.{u_1, u_3} {๐ : Type u_1} {ฮฉ : Type u_3} [DecidableEq ๐] (A : โ โ ฮฉ โ ๐) (a : ๐) (t : โ) (ฯ : ฮฉ) : โLearning.pullCount.{u_1, u_3} {๐ : Type u_1} {ฮฉ : Type u_3} [DecidableEq ๐] (A : โ โ ฮฉ โ ๐) (a : ๐) (t : โ) (ฯ : ฮฉ) : โ
Code
noncomputable def pullCount (A : โ โ ฮฉ โ ๐) (a : ๐) (t : โ) (ฯ : ฮฉ) : โ := #(filter (fun s โฆ A s ฯ = a) (range t))
Actions: Source ยท Open Issue