Propositional equality is `Decidable` for all elements of a type.

In other words, an instance of `DecidableEq α` is a means of deciding the proposition `a = b` is
for all `a b : α`.

The natural numbers, starting at zero.

This type is special-cased by both the kernel and the compiler, and overridden with an efficient
implementation. Both use a fast arbitrary-precision arithmetic library (usually
[GMP](https://gmplib.org/)); at runtime, `Nat` values that are sufficiently small are unboxed.

The product type, usually written `α × β`. Product types are also called pair or tuple types.
Elements of this type are pairs in which the first element is an `α` and the second element is a
`β`.

Products nest to the right, so `(x, y, z) : α × β × γ` is equivalent to `(x, (y, z)) : α × (β × γ)`.


Conventions for notations in identifiers:

 * The recommended spelling of `×` in identifiers is `Prod`.

`f.Eventually p` or `∀ᶠ x in f, p x` mean that `{x | p x} ∈ f`. E.g., `∀ᶠ x in atTop, p x`
means that `p` holds true for sufficiently large `x`.

`atTop` is the filter representing the limit `→ ∞` on an ordered set.
It is generated by the collection of up-sets `{b | a ≤ b}`.
(The preorder need not have a top element for this to be well defined,
and indeed is trivial when a top element `x` exists, i.e., it coincides with `pure x`.)

Array of rewards by count, truncated at time `t`: the entry `(a, m)` is the reward received at
the `(m + 1)`-th pull of action `a` if that pull happened before time `t`, and the entry
`(m + 1, a)` of the auxiliary array `ω.2` otherwise.

This is an auxiliary definition used to prove results about the distribution of `rewardByCount`.

It is defined recursively: at time `t`, the
entry `(A t, pullCount A (A t) t)` is replaced by the reward `R' t`.
See `rewardByCountUntil_apply_of_lt_pullCount` and `rewardByCountUntil_apply_of_pullCount_le`.

The equality relation. It has one introduction rule, `Eq.refl`.
We use `a = b` as notation for `Eq a b`.
A fundamental property of equality is that it is an equivalence relation.
```
variable (α : Type) (a b c d : α)
variable (hab : a = b) (hcb : c = b) (hcd : c = d)

example : a = d :=
  Eq.trans (Eq.trans hab (Eq.symm hcb)) hcd
```
Equality is much more than an equivalence relation, however. It has the important property that every assertion
respects the equivalence, in the sense that we can substitute equal expressions without changing the truth value.
That is, given `h1 : a = b` and `h2 : p a`, we can construct a proof for `p b` using substitution: `Eq.subst h1 h2`.
Example:
```
example (α : Type) (a b : α) (p : α → Prop)
        (h1 : a = b) (h2 : p a) : p b :=
  Eq.subst h1 h2

example (α : Type) (a b : α) (p : α → Prop)
    (h1 : a = b) (h2 : p a) : p b :=
  h1 ▸ h2
```
The triangle in the second presentation is a macro built on top of `Eq.subst` and `Eq.symm`, and you can enter it by typing `\t`.
For more information: [Equality](https://lean-lang.org/theorem_proving_in_lean4/quantifiers_and_equality.html#equality)


Conventions for notations in identifiers:

 * The recommended spelling of `=` in identifiers is `eq`.

Reward obtained when pulling action `a` for the `m`-th time.
If it is never pulled `m` times, the reward is given by the second component of `ω`, which in
applications will be indepedent with same law.

`a + b` computes the sum of `a` and `b`.
The meaning of this notation is type-dependent. 

Conventions for notations in identifiers:

 * The recommended spelling of `+` in identifiers is `add`.