Learning.action_stepsUntil
No docstring.
Learning.action_stepsUntil.{u_1, u_3} {π : Type u_1} {Ξ© : Type u_3} [DecidableEq π] {A : β β Ξ© β π} {a : π} {m : β} {Ο : Ξ©} (hm : m β 0) (h_exists : β s, pullCount A a (s + 1) Ο = m) : A (ENat.toNat (stepsUntil A a m Ο)) Ο = aLearning.action_stepsUntil.{u_1, u_3} {π : Type u_1} {Ξ© : Type u_3} [DecidableEq π] {A : β β Ξ© β π} {a : π} {m : β} {Ο : Ξ©} (hm : m β 0) (h_exists : β s, pullCount A a (s + 1) Ο = m) : A (ENat.toNat (stepsUntil A a m Ο)) Ο = a
Code
lemma action_stepsUntil (hm : m β 0) (h_exists : β s, pullCount A a (s + 1) Ο = m) :
A (stepsUntil A a m Ο).toNat Ο = aProof
by
classical
simp only [stepsUntil_eq_dite, h_exists, βreduceDIte, ENat.toNat_natCast]
have h_spec := Nat.find_spec h_exists
have h_spec' n := Nat.find_min h_exists (m := n)
by_cases h_zero : Nat.find h_exists = 0
Β· simp only [h_zero, zero_add, not_lt_zero, IsEmpty.forall_iff, implies_true] at *
by_contra h_ne
rw [β zero_add 1, pullCount_eq_pullCount_of_action_ne h_ne] at h_spec
simp only [pullCount_zero] at h_spec
exact hm h_spec.symm
have h_pos : 0 < Nat.find h_exists := Nat.pos_of_ne_zero h_zero
by_contra h_ne
refine h_spec' (Nat.find h_exists - 1) ?_ ?_
Β· simp [h_pos]
rw [Nat.sub_add_cancel (by omega)]
rwa [β pullCount_eq_pullCount_of_action_ne]
exact h_neActions: Source Β· Open Issue
Meaning last changed in v4.34.0-rc1-3-g2cf8f3b (2026-08-20).
Self-contained, with its dependencies inlined and proofs replaced by sorry: download the raw file Β· open it in the Lean web editor.
Dependency graph
Audit surface: 2 project declarations, 27 external constants
β Proved: no sorry anywhere in its closure
This is the tool's own reading of one build's recorded axioms, and it is not robust against an author who wants it to pass. Checking meant to be relied on should go through Comparator, which replays the proof through the kernel from an export against an explicit list of permitted axioms.