LeanMachineLearning

Learning.stepKernel_zero๐Ÿ”—

Lemma

No docstring.

Types
  • ๐“ž : Type u_1m๐“ž : MeasurableSpace ๐“žA measurable space is a space equipped with a ฯƒ-algebra.
  • ๐“ : Type u_2m๐“ : MeasurableSpace ๐“
  • ๐“จ : Type u_3m๐“จ : MeasurableSpace ๐“จ
Given
Then
(stepKernel alg env 0) h = env.obs0.compProd (alg.p0.compProd env.ฮฝ0)
Code
lemma stepKernel_zero (alg : Algorithm ๐“ž ๐“ ๐“จ) (env : Environment ๐“ž ๐“ ๐“จ) (h : Hist ๐“ž ๐“ ๐“จ 0) :
    stepKernel alg env 0 h = env.obs0 โŠ—โ‚˜ (alg.p0 โŠ—โ‚– env.ฮฝ0)
Proof
by
  rw [Unique.eq_default h, stepKernel, Kernel.compProd_apply_eq_compProd_sectR]
  congr 1
  ext o s hs
  rw [Kernel.sectR_apply, Kernel.compProd_apply hs, Kernel.compProd_apply hs]
  rfl

Meaning last changed in v4.34.0-rc2-76-g565f652 (2026-09-10), the 2th recorded change.

Self-contained, with its dependencies inlined and proofs replaced by sorry: download the raw file ยท open it in the Lean web editor.

Dependency graph

Audit surface: 8 project declarations, 24 external constants

โœ“ Proved: no sorry anywhere in its closure

This is the tool's own reading of one build's recorded axioms, and it is not robust against an author who wants it to pass. Checking meant to be relied on should go through Comparator, which replays the proof through the kernel from an export against an explicit list of permitted axioms.