Learning.measurable_step
No docstring.
Learning.measurable_step.{u_1, u_2, u_3} {๐ : Type u_1} {๐จ : Type u_2} {ฮฉ : Type u_3} {m๐ : MeasurableSpace ๐} {m๐จ : MeasurableSpace ๐จ} {mฮฉ : MeasurableSpace ฮฉ} {A : โ โ ฮฉ โ ๐} {Y : โ โ ฮฉ โ ๐จ} (n : โ) (hA : Measurable (A n)) (hY : Measurable (Y n)) : Measurable (step A Y n)Learning.measurable_step.{u_1, u_2, u_3} {๐ : Type u_1} {๐จ : Type u_2} {ฮฉ : Type u_3} {m๐ : MeasurableSpace ๐} {m๐จ : MeasurableSpace ๐จ} {mฮฉ : MeasurableSpace ฮฉ} {A : โ โ ฮฉ โ ๐} {Y : โ โ ฮฉ โ ๐จ} (n : โ) (hA : Measurable (A n)) (hY : Measurable (Y n)) : Measurable (step A Y n)
Code
lemma measurable_step (n : โ) (hA : Measurable (A n)) (hY : Measurable (Y n)) :
Measurable (step A Y n)Proof
by unfold step fun_prop
Actions: Source ยท Open Issue
Meaning unchanged since v4.33.0-rc1-29-gce231eb, the oldest revision on record (2026-07-30).
Self-contained, with its dependencies inlined and proofs replaced by sorry: download the raw file ยท open it in the Lean web editor.
Dependency graph
Audit surface: 1 project declarations, 6 external constants
โ Proved: no sorry anywhere in its closure
This is the tool's own reading of one build's recorded axioms, and it is not robust against an author who wants it to pass. Checking meant to be relied on should go through Comparator, which replays the proof through the kernel from an export against an explicit list of permitted axioms.