LeanMachineLearning exposition

Learning.measurable_step🔗

This page has the declaration's own card below, then its dependency graph, then a card for each dependency (type dependencies first, then the rest of the transitive closure). For a theorem, the graph and the dependency cards only follow its statement's dependencies (its proof is replaced by sorry, so what it proves doesn't depend on how); for everything else, both the type and the body/value are followed, since their content is part of what later declarations build on.

Minimal Lean file

measurable_step🔗

LemmaLearning.measurable_step

No docstring.

🔗theorem
Learning.measurable_step.{u_1, u_2, u_3} {𝓐 : Type u_1} {𝓨 : Type u_2} {Ω : Type u_3} {m𝓐 : MeasurableSpace 𝓐} {m𝓨 : MeasurableSpace 𝓨} { : MeasurableSpace Ω} {A : Ω 𝓐} {Y : Ω 𝓨} (n : ) (hA : Measurable (A n)) (hY : Measurable (Y n)) : Measurable (step A Y n)
Learning.measurable_step.{u_1, u_2, u_3} {𝓐 : Type u_1} {𝓨 : Type u_2} {Ω : Type u_3} {m𝓐 : MeasurableSpace 𝓐} {m𝓨 : MeasurableSpace 𝓨} { : MeasurableSpace Ω} {A : Ω 𝓐} {Y : Ω 𝓨} (n : ) (hA : Measurable (A n)) (hY : Measurable (Y n)) : Measurable (step A Y n)

Code

lemma measurable_step (n : ℕ) (hA : Measurable (A n)) (hY : Measurable (Y n)) :
    Measurable (step A Y n)
Type uses (1)
Used by (2)

Actions: Source · Open Issue

Proof
by
  unfold step
  fun_prop

Dependency graph

Type dependencies (1)

step🔗

DefinitionLearning.step

Step of the algorithm-environment sequence: the action-feedback pair at time n.

🔗def
Learning.step.{u_1, u_2, u_3} {𝓐 : Type u_1} {𝓨 : Type u_2} {Ω : Type u_3} (A : Ω 𝓐) (Y : Ω 𝓨) (n : ) (ω : Ω) : 𝓐 × 𝓨
Learning.step.{u_1, u_2, u_3} {𝓐 : Type u_1} {𝓨 : Type u_2} {Ω : Type u_3} (A : Ω 𝓐) (Y : Ω 𝓨) (n : ) (ω : Ω) : 𝓐 × 𝓨

Code

def step (A : ℕ → Ω → 𝓐) (Y : ℕ → Ω → 𝓨) (n : ℕ) (ω : Ω) : 𝓐 × 𝓨 :=
  (A n ω, Y n ω)
Used by (12)

Actions: Source · Open Issue