Learning.measurable_step
This page has the declaration's own card below, then its dependency graph, then a card for each dependency (type dependencies first, then the rest of the transitive closure). For a theorem, the graph and the dependency cards only follow its statement's dependencies (its proof is replaced by sorry, so what it proves doesn't depend on how); for everything else, both the type and the body/value are followed, since their content is part of what later declarations build on.
measurable_step🔗
Learning.measurable_stepNo docstring.
Learning.measurable_step.{u_1, u_2, u_3} {𝓐 : Type u_1} {𝓨 : Type u_2} {Ω : Type u_3} {m𝓐 : MeasurableSpace 𝓐} {m𝓨 : MeasurableSpace 𝓨} {mΩ : MeasurableSpace Ω} {A : ℕ → Ω → 𝓐} {Y : ℕ → Ω → 𝓨} (n : ℕ) (hA : Measurable (A n)) (hY : Measurable (Y n)) : Measurable (step A Y n)Learning.measurable_step.{u_1, u_2, u_3} {𝓐 : Type u_1} {𝓨 : Type u_2} {Ω : Type u_3} {m𝓐 : MeasurableSpace 𝓐} {m𝓨 : MeasurableSpace 𝓨} {mΩ : MeasurableSpace Ω} {A : ℕ → Ω → 𝓐} {Y : ℕ → Ω → 𝓨} (n : ℕ) (hA : Measurable (A n)) (hY : Measurable (Y n)) : Measurable (step A Y n)
Code
lemma measurable_step (n : ℕ) (hA : Measurable (A n)) (hY : Measurable (Y n)) :
Measurable (step A Y n)Type uses (1)
Used by (2)
Actions: Source · Open Issue
Proof
by unfold step fun_prop
Dependency graph
Type dependencies (1)
step🔗
Learning.step
Step of the algorithm-environment sequence: the action-feedback pair at time n.
Learning.step.{u_1, u_2, u_3} {𝓐 : Type u_1} {𝓨 : Type u_2} {Ω : Type u_3} (A : ℕ → Ω → 𝓐) (Y : ℕ → Ω → 𝓨) (n : ℕ) (ω : Ω) : 𝓐 × 𝓨Learning.step.{u_1, u_2, u_3} {𝓐 : Type u_1} {𝓨 : Type u_2} {Ω : Type u_3} (A : ℕ → Ω → 𝓐) (Y : ℕ → Ω → 𝓨) (n : ℕ) (ω : Ω) : 𝓐 × 𝓨
Code
def step (A : ℕ → Ω → 𝓐) (Y : ℕ → Ω → 𝓨) (n : ℕ) (ω : Ω) : 𝓐 × 𝓨 := (A n ω, Y n ω)
Used by (12)
Actions: Source · Open Issue