Bandits.regret_nonneg🔗

This page has the declaration's own card below, then its dependency graph, then a card for each dependency (type dependencies first, then the rest of the transitive closure). For a theorem, the graph and the dependency cards only follow its statement's dependencies (its proof is replaced by sorry, so what it proves doesn't depend on how); for everything else, both the type and the body/value are followed, since their content is part of what later declarations build on.

Minimal Lean file

Bandits.regret_nonneg.{u_1, u_2} {𝓐 : Type u_1} {Ω : Type u_2}
  {m𝓐 : MeasurableSpace 𝓐} {ν : ProbabilityTheory.Kernel 𝓐 ℝ}
  {A : ℕ → Ω → 𝓐} {ω : Ω} {t : ℕ} [Finite 𝓐] : 0 ≤ regret ν A t ω
Bandits.regret_nonneg.{u_1, u_2}
  {𝓐 : Type u_1} {Ω : Type u_2}
  {m𝓐 : MeasurableSpace 𝓐}
  {ν : ProbabilityTheory.Kernel 𝓐 ℝ}
  {A : ℕ → Ω → 𝓐} {ω : Ω} {t : ℕ}
  [Finite 𝓐] : 0 ≤ regret ν A t ω

lemma regret_nonneg [Finite 𝓐] : 0 ≤ regret ν A t ω

by
  rw [regret_eq_sum_gap]
  exact sum_nonneg (fun _ _ ↦ gap_nonneg)

Dependency graph

Type dependencies (1)

Bandits.regret.{u_1, u_2} {𝓐 : Type u_1} {Ω : Type u_2}
  {m𝓐 : MeasurableSpace 𝓐} (ν : ProbabilityTheory.Kernel 𝓐 ℝ)
  (A : ℕ → Ω → 𝓐) (t : ℕ) (ω : Ω) : ℝ
Bandits.regret.{u_1, u_2} {𝓐 : Type u_1}
  {Ω : Type u_2} {m𝓐 : MeasurableSpace 𝓐}
  (ν : ProbabilityTheory.Kernel 𝓐 ℝ)
  (A : ℕ → Ω → 𝓐) (t : ℕ) (ω : Ω) : ℝ

noncomputable
def regret (ν : Kernel 𝓐 ℝ) (A : ℕ → Ω → 𝓐) (t : ℕ) (ω : Ω) : ℝ :=
  t * (⨆ a, (ν a)[id]) - ∑ s ∈ range t, (ν (A s ω))[id]