LeanMachineLearning

Bandits.ArrayModel.hasLaw_snd_apply_arrayMeasurešŸ”—

Lemma

No docstring.

Types
  • š“ : Type u_1mš“ : MeasurableSpace š“A measurable space is a space equipped with a σ-algebra.
  • š“” : Type u_2mš“” : MeasurableSpace š“”
Given
  • ν : ProbabilityTheory.Kernel š“ š“”A kernel from a measurable space α to another measurable space β is a measurable function Īŗ : α → Measure β.ProbabilityTheory.IsMarkovKernel νA kernel is a Markov kernel if every measure in its image is a probability measure.
  • n : ā„•
  • a : š“
Then
ProbabilityTheory.HasLaw (fun ω => ω.2 n a) (ν a) (arrayMeasure ν)
The predicate HasLaw X μ P registers the fact that the random variable X has law μ under the measure P, in other words that P.map X = μ.
Code
lemma hasLaw_snd_apply_arrayMeasure (ν : Kernel š“ š“”) [IsMarkovKernel ν] (n : ā„•) (a : š“) :
    HasLaw (fun ω : probSpace š“ š“” ↦ ω.2 n a) (ν a) (arrayMeasure ν)
Proof
hasLaw_snd_apply_prod_streamMeasure _ ν n a

Meaning last changed in v4.35.0-rc2-1-g61e506b (2026-09-22), the 3th recorded change.

Self-contained, with its dependencies inlined and proofs replaced by sorry: download the raw file Ā· open it in the Lean web editor.

Dependency graph

Audit surface: 3 project declarations, 25 external constants

āœ“ Proved: no sorry anywhere in its closure

This is the tool's own reading of one build's recorded axioms, and it is not robust against an author who wants it to pass. Checking meant to be relied on should go through Comparator, which replays the proof through the kernel from an export against an explicit list of permitted axioms.