Bandits.ETC.isAlgEnvSeqUntil_roundRobinAlgorithm
Until round K * m - 1, the ETC algorithm behaves like the Round-Robin algorithm.
Bandits.ETC.isAlgEnvSeqUntil_roundRobinAlgorithm.{u_1} {K : โ} {hK : 0 < K} {m : โ} {ฮฝ : ProbabilityTheory.Kernel (Fin K) โ} [ProbabilityTheory.IsMarkovKernel ฮฝ] {ฮฉ : Type u_1} {mฮฉ : MeasurableSpace ฮฉ} {P : MeasureTheory.Measure ฮฉ} [MeasureTheory.IsProbabilityMeasure P] {A : โ โ ฮฉ โ Fin K} {R : โ โ ฮฉ โ โ} (h : Learning.IsAlgEnvSeq A R (etcAlgorithm hK m) (Learning.stationaryEnv ฮฝ) P) : Learning.IsAlgEnvSeqUntil A R (Learning.roundRobinAlgorithm hK) (Learning.stationaryEnv ฮฝ) P (K * m - 1)Bandits.ETC.isAlgEnvSeqUntil_roundRobinAlgorithm.{u_1} {K : โ} {hK : 0 < K} {m : โ} {ฮฝ : ProbabilityTheory.Kernel (Fin K) โ} [ProbabilityTheory.IsMarkovKernel ฮฝ] {ฮฉ : Type u_1} {mฮฉ : MeasurableSpace ฮฉ} {P : MeasureTheory.Measure ฮฉ} [MeasureTheory.IsProbabilityMeasure P] {A : โ โ ฮฉ โ Fin K} {R : โ โ ฮฉ โ โ} (h : Learning.IsAlgEnvSeq A R (etcAlgorithm hK m) (Learning.stationaryEnv ฮฝ) P) : Learning.IsAlgEnvSeqUntil A R (Learning.roundRobinAlgorithm hK) (Learning.stationaryEnv ฮฝ) P (K * m - 1)
Code
lemma isAlgEnvSeqUntil_roundRobinAlgorithm
(h : IsAlgEnvSeq A R (etcAlgorithm hK m) (stationaryEnv ฮฝ) P) :
IsAlgEnvSeqUntil A R (roundRobinAlgorithm hK) (stationaryEnv ฮฝ) P (K * m - 1) where
measurable_actionProof
h.measurable_action
measurable_feedback := h.measurable_feedback
hasLaw_action_zero := h.hasLaw_action_zero
hasCondDistrib_feedback_zero := h.hasCondDistrib_feedback_zero
hasCondDistrib_action n hn := by
convert h.hasCondDistrib_action n using 1
simp only [roundRobinAlgorithm, detAlgorithm_policy, etcAlgorithm]
congr 1 with h
simp [ETC.nextArm, hn]
hasCondDistrib_feedback n _ := h.hasCondDistrib_feedback nActions: Source ยท Open Issue
Meaning last changed in v4.34.0-rc2-14-gf86702d (2026-08-25), the 5th recorded change.
Self-contained, with its dependencies inlined and proofs replaced by sorry: download the raw file ยท open it in the Lean web editor.
Dependency graph
Audit surface: 18 project declarations, 105 external constants
โ Proved: no sorry anywhere in its closure
This is the tool's own reading of one build's recorded axioms, and it is not robust against an author who wants it to pass. Checking meant to be relied on should go through Comparator, which replays the proof through the kernel from an export against an explicit list of permitted axioms.