ProbabilityTheory.indepFun_proj_infinitePi_infinitePi
No docstring.
ProbabilityTheory.indepFun_proj_infinitePi_infinitePi.{u_1, u_2, u_3} {ι : Type u_1} {κ : Type u_2} {𝓧 : ι → κ → Type u_3} [m𝓧 : (i : ι) → (j : κ) → MeasurableSpace (𝓧 i j)] {μ : (i : ι) → (j : κ) → MeasureTheory.Measure (𝓧 i j)} [∀ (i : ι) (j : κ), MeasureTheory.IsProbabilityMeasure (μ i j)] {a b : κ} (h : a ≠ b) : IndepFun (fun ω i => ω i a) (fun ω i => ω i b) (MeasureTheory.Measure.infinitePi fun i => MeasureTheory.Measure.infinitePi (μ i))ProbabilityTheory.indepFun_proj_infinitePi_infinitePi.{u_1, u_2, u_3} {ι : Type u_1} {κ : Type u_2} {𝓧 : ι → κ → Type u_3} [m𝓧 : (i : ι) → (j : κ) → MeasurableSpace (𝓧 i j)] {μ : (i : ι) → (j : κ) → MeasureTheory.Measure (𝓧 i j)} [∀ (i : ι) (j : κ), MeasureTheory.IsProbabilityMeasure (μ i j)] {a b : κ} (h : a ≠ b) : IndepFun (fun ω i => ω i a) (fun ω i => ω i b) (MeasureTheory.Measure.infinitePi fun i => MeasureTheory.Measure.infinitePi (μ i))
Code
lemma indepFun_proj_infinitePi_infinitePi {a b : κ} (h : a ≠ b) :
IndepFun (fun ω i ↦ ω i a) (fun ω i ↦ ω i b) (infinitePi (fun i ↦ infinitePi (μ i)))Proof
by
simp_rw [IndepFun_iff_Indep, MeasurableSpace.comap_pi]
have hd : Disjoint (range fun i : ι ↦ (i, a)) (range fun i ↦ (i, b)) := by
simp [disjoint_range_iff, h]
convert indep_iSup_of_disjoint (fun _ ↦ Measurable.comap_le (by fun_prop))
(iIndepFun_uncurry_infinitePi' (X := fun _ _ x ↦ x) μ (by fun_prop)) hd
all_goals rw [iSup_range]Actions: Source · Open Issue
Meaning last changed in v4.34.0-rc2-1-g439785b (2026-08-23), the 3th recorded change.
Self-contained, with its dependencies inlined and proofs replaced by sorry: download the raw file · open it in the Lean web editor.
Dependency graph
Nothing to draw. Its statement rests on no other declaration in this project, and names nothing from a package left unaudited — so the graph is this declaration alone. That is the answer, not a missing picture.
Audit surface: 0 project declarations, 7 external constants
✓ Proved: no sorry anywhere in its closure
This is the tool's own reading of one build's recorded axioms, and it is not robust against an author who wants it to pass. Checking meant to be relied on should go through Comparator, which replays the proof through the kernel from an export against an explicit list of permitted axioms.