ProbabilityTheory.indepFun_cond_of_indepFun
No docstring.
ProbabilityTheory.indepFun_cond_of_indepFun.{u_6, u_7, u_8} {α : Type u_6} {β : Type u_7} {γ : Type u_8} {mα : MeasurableSpace α} {mβ : MeasurableSpace β} {mγ : MeasurableSpace γ} {μ : MeasureTheory.Measure α} {X : α → β} {Y : α → γ} (hXY : IndepFun X Y μ) (hY : Measurable Y) {s : Set γ} (hs : MeasurableSet s) : IndepFun X Y μ[|Y ⁻¹' s]ProbabilityTheory.indepFun_cond_of_indepFun.{u_6, u_7, u_8} {α : Type u_6} {β : Type u_7} {γ : Type u_8} {mα : MeasurableSpace α} {mβ : MeasurableSpace β} {mγ : MeasurableSpace γ} {μ : MeasureTheory.Measure α} {X : α → β} {Y : α → γ} (hXY : IndepFun X Y μ) (hY : Measurable Y) {s : Set γ} (hs : MeasurableSet s) : IndepFun X Y μ[|Y ⁻¹' s]
Code
lemma indepFun_cond_of_indepFun {α β γ : Type*} {mα : MeasurableSpace α} {mβ : MeasurableSpace β}
{mγ : MeasurableSpace γ} {μ : Measure α}
{X : α → β} {Y : α → γ} (hXY : X ⟂ᵢ[μ] Y) (hY : Measurable Y) {s : Set γ}
(hs : MeasurableSet s) :
X ⟂ᵢ[μ[|Y ⁻¹' s]] YProof
by
by_cases h_zero : μ[|Y ⁻¹' s] = 0
· simp [h_zero]
rw [cond_eq_zero] at h_zero
push Not at h_zero -- `h_zero : μ (Y ⁻¹' s) ≠ ⊤ ∧ μ (Y ⁻¹' s) ≠ 0`
rw [indepFun_iff_measure_inter_preimage_eq_mul] at hXY ⊢
intro u t hu ht
rw [cond_apply (hs.preimage hY), cond_apply (hs.preimage hY), cond_apply (hs.preimage hY)]
have h_eq : Y ⁻¹' s ∩ (X ⁻¹' u ∩ Y ⁻¹' t) = X ⁻¹' u ∩ Y ⁻¹' (s ∩ t) := by grind
have hsu : μ (X ⁻¹' u ∩ Y ⁻¹' s) = μ (X ⁻¹' u) * μ (Y ⁻¹' s) := hXY u s hu hs
rw [Set.inter_comm] at hsu
have hust : μ (X ⁻¹' u ∩ Y ⁻¹' (s ∩ t)) = μ (X ⁻¹' u) * μ (Y ⁻¹' (s ∩ t)) :=
hXY u (s ∩ t) hu (hs.inter ht)
rw [hsu, h_eq, hust]
simp_rw [mul_assoc]
congr 1
rw [← mul_assoc (μ (Y ⁻¹' s)), ENNReal.mul_inv_cancel h_zero.2 h_zero.1, one_mul]
congrActions: Source · Open Issue
Meaning last changed in v4.34.0-rc2-1-g439785b (2026-08-23), the 3th recorded change.
Self-contained, with its dependencies inlined and proofs replaced by sorry: download the raw file · open it in the Lean web editor.
Dependency graph
Nothing to draw. Its statement rests on no other declaration in this project, and names nothing from a package left unaudited — so the graph is this declaration alone. That is the answer, not a missing picture.
Audit surface: 0 project declarations, 8 external constants
✓ Proved: no sorry anywhere in its closure
This is the tool's own reading of one build's recorded axioms, and it is not robust against an author who wants it to pass. Checking meant to be relied on should go through Comparator, which replays the proof through the kernel from an export against an explicit list of permitted axioms.