MeasurableEquiv.coe_refl
No docstring.
-
α : Type u_2mα : MeasurableSpace αA measurable space is a space equipped with a σ-algebra.
⇑(refl α) = idMeasurableSpace : Type u_6 → Type u_6A measurable space is a space equipped with a σ-algebra.
Eq : {α : Sort u_1} → α → α → PropThe equality relation. It has one introduction rule, `Eq.refl`.
We use `a = b` as notation for `Eq a b`.
A fundamental property of equality is that it is an equivalence relation.
```
variable (α : Type) (a b c d : α)
variable (hab : a = b) (hcb : c = b) (hcd : c = d)
example : a = d :=
Eq.trans (Eq.trans hab (Eq.symm hcb)) hcd
```
Equality is much more than an equivalence relation, however. It has the important property that every assertion
respects the equivalence, in the sense that we can substitute equal expressions without changing the truth value.
That is, given `h1 : a = b` and `h2 : p a`, we can construct a proof for `p b` using substitution: `Eq.subst h1 h2`.
Example:
```
example (α : Type) (a b : α) (p : α → Prop)
(h1 : a = b) (h2 : p a) : p b :=
Eq.subst h1 h2
example (α : Type) (a b : α) (p : α → Prop)
(h1 : a = b) (h2 : p a) : p b :=
h1 ▸ h2
```
The triangle in the second presentation is a macro built on top of `Eq.subst` and `Eq.symm`, and you can enter it by typing `\t`.
For more information: [Equality](https://lean-lang.org/theorem_proving_in_lean4/quantifiers_and_equality.html#equality)
Conventions for notations in identifiers:
* The recommended spelling of `=` in identifiers is `eq`.MeasurableEquiv.refl : (α : Type u_6) → [inst : MeasurableSpace α] → α ≃ᵐ αAny measurable space is equivalent to itself.
id : {α : Sort u} → α → αThe identity function. `id` takes an implicit argument `α : Sort u` (a type in any universe), and an argument `a : α`, and returns `a`. Although this may look like a useless function, one application of the identity function is to explicitly put a type on an expression. If `e` has type `T`, and `T'` is definitionally equal to `T`, then `@id T' e` typechecks, and Lean knows that this expression has type `T'` rather than `T`. This can make a difference for typeclass inference, since `T` and `T'` may have different typeclass instances on them. `show T' from e` is sugar for an `@id T' e` expression.
Code
lemma coe_refl {α : Type*} {mα : MeasurableSpace α} :
(refl α : α → α) = idProof
rfl
New in v4.34.0-rc2-39-gb743f31 (2026-09-08), and its meaning has not changed since.
Self-contained, with its dependencies inlined and proofs replaced by sorry: download the raw file · open it in the Lean web editor.
Dependency graph
Nothing to draw. Its statement rests on no other declaration in this project, and names nothing from a package left unaudited — so the graph is this declaration alone. That is the answer, not a missing picture.
Audit surface: 0 project declarations, 8 external constants
✓ Proved: no sorry anywhere in its closure
This is the tool's own reading of one build's recorded axioms, and it is not robust against an author who wants it to pass. Checking meant to be relied on should go through Comparator, which replays the proof through the kernel from an export against an explicit list of permitted axioms.